IT Dribble

Mutterings, inconsistant tips, rants and randomness

Docker and IPtables Firewall Merger

by

The problem: Modifying firewall rules on a host that runs Docker or Rancher (cattle) causes the docker-bridges and rancher NAT rules to be blown away, causing all your containers networking to break.

The solution: Modify /etc/sysconfig/iptables as normal and instead of running iptables-restore /etc/sysconfig/iptables run as root: dockerFirewallMerge.py

I’d appreciate some constructive feedback! https://github.com/c … /DockerFirewallMerge

Squid HTTPS interception and filtering without client certificates

by

I had a requirement to filter (all) web traffic on a few servers. This is typically easy with Squid and using it’s transparent proxy function. Where it gets difficult is filtering domains for HTTPS traffic.
I don’t want to SSL intercept the traffic, I don’t want to install CA certificates on the clients, I only want to filter the URLs based on a whitelist to which it can access. This is how it is done:

yum install squid
# I used squid 3.5.20

/usr/lib64/squid/ssl_crtd -c -s /var/lib/ssl_db
chown -R squid.squid /var/lib/ssl_db

mkdir /etc/squid/ssl_cert/
chown -R squid.squid /etc/squid/ssl_cert/
cd /etc/squid/ssl_cert
openssl req -new -newkey rsa:1024 -days 1365 -nodes -x509 -keyout myca.pem -out myca.pem

echo "www.google.com" > /etc/squid/whitelist
chmod 640 /etc/squid/whitelist
chown root:squid /etc/squid/whitelist

/etc/squid/squid.conf:

acl localnet src 10.0.0.0/8	# RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src 127.0.0.1/32	# RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src 172.16.0.0/12	# RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src 192.168.0.0/16	# RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src fc00::/7       # RFC 4193 local private network range
acl localnet src fe80::/10      # RFC 4291 link-local (directly plugged) machines

acl SSL_ports port 443
acl Safe_ports port 80		# http
acl Safe_ports port 21		# ftp
acl Safe_ports port 443		# https
acl Safe_ports port 70		# gopher
acl Safe_ports port 210		# wais
acl Safe_ports port 1025-65535	# unregistered ports
acl Safe_ports port 280		# http-mgmt
acl Safe_ports port 488		# gss-http
acl Safe_ports port 591		# filemaker
acl Safe_ports port 777		# multiling http
acl CONNECT method CONNECT

http_access deny !Safe_ports

http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports

http_access allow localhost manager
http_access deny manager

acl step1 at_step SslBump1
acl whitelist_ssl ssl::server_name "/etc/squid/whitelist"
acl whitelist dstdomain "/etc/squid/whitelist"
acl port_80 port 80
acl http proto http

ssl_bump peek step1
ssl_bump splice whitelist_ssl
ssl_bump terminate all !whitelist_ssl

http_access deny http port_80 localnet !whitelist
http_access allow localnet
http_access deny all

https_port 3127 intercept ssl-bump generate-host-certificates=on dynamic_cert_mem_cache_size=4MB cert=/etc/squid/ssl_cert/myca.pem key=/etc/squid/ssl_cert/myca.pem
http_port 3128 transparent

coredump_dir /var/spool/squid

refresh_pattern ^ftp:		1440	20%	10080
refresh_pattern ^gopher:	1440	0%	1440
refresh_pattern -i (/cgi-bin/|\?) 0	0%	0
refresh_pattern .		0	20%	4320

# Test it with:

iptables -m owner --uid-owner cm -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:3128
iptables -m owner --uid-owner cm -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:3127

# Closing notes and thoughts

Around this section here:
http_access deny http port_80 localnet !whitelist
http_access allow localnet
http_access deny all

It looks a bit funny because we ‘allow localnet’ which typically allows our clients open access. However assessing:

ssl_bump terminate all !whitelist_ssl
http_access deny http port_80 localnet !whitelist

rules first, you see that we filter out all sites other than the whitelist with an explicit ‘deny’ or ssl ‘terminate’.

Also trying to use a proxy-aware application with the above configuration will not work because the proxy is configured in transparent / intercept mode ONLY. This is likely due to not having a normal http_port directive, this is good for me as it’s minimizing the abuse avenues.

Also for a final, final step, you need to configure your edge (or local) firewall to do destination NAT’ing back to the two Squid ports.

Add comments to IPTables firewall rules

by

Instead of just documenting the IPTables configuration file eg: /etc/sysconfig/iptables with comments (#’s) you can also input comments as part of the ruleset itself. So when you perform iptables -L -v -n you get the following output:

root@server070:[~]: iptables -L -v -n
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination
  64M 4727M ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
    5   474 ACCEPT     icmp --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
 202K   27M ACCEPT     all  --  lo     *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
   16   880 ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           state NEW tcp dpt:22
 137M   38G ACCEPT     udp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           udp dpt:514 /* Syslog traffic */
   28  1664 ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           tcp dpt:514 /* Syslog traffic */
41067 2050K ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           tcp dpt:9997 /* Universal Forwarder traffic */
    0     0 ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           tcp dpt:8089 /* Splunk SSL traffic */
   47  2564 ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           tcp dpt:8000 /* Splunk web interface */
14135 1313K LOG        all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           limit: avg 5/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 7 prefix `iptables denied: '
 218K   21M REJECT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           reject-with icmp-host-prohibited

All that you need to do use the following example in your configuration file:

root@server070:[~]: cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 514 -m comment --comment "Syslog traffic" -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 514 -m comment --comment "Syslog traffic" -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9997 -m comment --comment "Universal Forwarder traffic" -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8089 -m comment --comment "Splunk SSL traffic" -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8000 -m comment --comment "Splunk web interface" -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m limit --limit 5/min -j LOG --log-prefix "iptables denied: " --log-level 7
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT

Happy commenting!

Configure UTM 220 LCD panel under Linux

by

I had the task of rebuilding an Astaro UTM 220 with CentOS and the LCD panel looked so lifeless, So I decided to restore it to some version of functional! From my research I can see that the display is LCM-162 and utilises the lcd driver HD44780.

In a nut shell here is what I did:

  • Download LCDproc (http://lcdproc.omnipotent.net/)
  • Modify: lcdproc-0.5.6/server/drivers/hd44780-ext8bit.c

Change:

#define RS  STRB
#define RW  LF
#define EN1 INIT 

To:

#define RS  SEL
#define RW  INIT
#define EN1 LF 
  • compile it with option: ‘./configure –enable-drivers=hd44780′
  • make && make install
  • Modify: /usr/local/etc/LCDd.conf

Change:

  • Line 53: Driver=hd44780
  • Line 502: ConnectionType=8bit
  • Line 509: Device=/dev/parport0
  • Line 544: Size=16×2

Test it:

LCDd -f -r 4 -c /usr/local/etc/LCDd.conf &
lcdproc -f -s localhost -p 13666 C M L

If it works its just a matter of copying: scripts/init-LCDd.rpm and scripts/init-lcdproc.rpm to /etc/init.d and configuring chkconfig properly.

Hopefully that helps.